header-left
File #: 040417    Version: 0 Name:
Type: Resolution Status: ADOPTED
File created: 4/22/2004 In control: CITY COUNCIL
On agenda: Final action: 4/22/2004
Title: Urging the U.S. Senate to oppose bill S.2290 the 'Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2004'
Sponsors: Councilmember Ramos, Councilmember Reynolds Brown, Councilmember Nutter, Councilmember Miller, Councilmember Goode, Councilmember Rizzo, Councilmember Clarke, Councilmember Kelly, Council President Verna, Councilmember Tasco, Councilmember DiCicco, Councilmember Blackwell, Councilmember Krajewski

Title

Urging the U.S. Senate to oppose bill S.2290 the ‘Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2004’

Body

WHEREAS, Asbestos is a fibrous mineral that was commonly used until the mid 1970s for insulation and fire proofing; and

 

WHEREAS, When inhaled, its tiny fibers can cause cancer and other ailments that take decades to develop; and

 

WHEREAS, The U. S. Senate is considering the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act (S.2290) which would establish a trust fund that would be financed by business and insurance companies and would ostensibly expedite funds to people with asbestos-related diseases; and

 

WHEREAS, In exchange for this fund being created, asbestos victims could not take asbestos-makers to court; and

 

WHEREAS, This bill would put limitations on exactly how many years a person must be exposed and on the average, seriously ill victims of asbestos would receive less compensation, under S.2290, than they would in the tort system; and

 

WHEREAS, Over the past few years, the Laborers International Union of North America (LIUNA) has been in serious talks with representatives from the trial bar and the asbestos-related industry in an attempt to forge a consensus on a national trust fund to fairly compensate asbestos victims and provide financial certainty for asbestos defendants and their insurers; and

 

WHEREAS, This bill does not provide enough money to justify victims surrendering their right to sue the companies they believe sickened them; and

 

WHEREAS, The bill is essentially capped at $109 Billion over 24 years no matter what the true costs may be, and despite the fact that projections of future claims indicate that this level of funding is simply inadequate to award fair compensation to present and future asbestos victims; now therefore

 

RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, That this proposed legislation is fatally flawed because it does not adequately address the issues under consideration, and that therefore this legislative body urges the U.S. Senate to oppose U.S. Senate Bill S.2290 the ‘Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2004’

End