Title
Authorizing the City Council Committee on Public Safety to hold hearings examining the use of vehicle immobilizing "window barnacles" as a form of predatory parking by private entities to understand the impact they have on Philadelphia's residents.
Body
WHEREAS, The window barnacle is a new way to immobilize vehicles that have violated multiple parking or traffic laws. Rather than using a traditional parking boot, parking officers can place the barnacle on the windshield of a car, suction it to the glass, and arm it with a keypad; and
WHEREAS, The barnacles are 20 pounds and stick to windshields with 750 pounds of force. If drivers attempt to driveaway with a barnacle placed on their car, a high-pitched alarm will sound. Unlike a parking boot, abandoned vehicles can be towed away easily without damage to the car. Window barnacles are more efficient in removal after tickets or violations are paid off. A code to the lock is used to remove the immobilization device; and
WHEREAS, Window barnacles were first tested in Allentown, Pennsylvania and have moved into cities such as Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Salt Lake City, Utah, and more. It has also been implemented at universities across the world; and
WHEREAS, Individuals that have been "barnacled" have complained about high fees to remove the immobilization device. Students at the University of Oklahoma stated that there was a $185 fee for removal for parking illegally on one occasion. These students have also devised a way to remove the suction device, escaping fines. Running a windshield defroster for 15 minutes and then swiping a credit card under the suction cups releases the barnacle has been used to remove the device without fines; and
WHEREAS, The issue of high fines in regards to the window barnacle have been widely reported. A student at the University of Houston reported that she had to pay $920 to get her car back in her possession; and
WHEREAS, These devices are still being tested and improved ...
Click here for full text