Title
Authorizing the Committees on Public Safety and Legislative Oversight to investigate Police Department progress in ensuring the constitutionality and racial neutrality of stops and frisks, pursuant to the settlement agreement in Bailey v. City of Philadelphia.
Body
WHEREAS, In June of 2011, the City of Philadelphia entered into a settlement agreement in a federal class action filed by the ACLU of Pennsylvania and the law firm of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg. The eight plaintiffs, all African-American or Latino men, alleged that they were stopped by Philadelphia police officers solely on the basis of their race or ethnicity. The settlement agreement required that the Police Department collect data on all stops and frisks, provide officers with enhanced training and supervision regarding stop-and-frisk practices, and undergo monitoring by an independent court-appointed monitor who would review and analyze the data and have authority to recommend practices and policies to ensure constitutionality of stops and frisks; and
WHEREAS, Since the announcement of the settlement agreement, the Police Department has made substantial progress in reducing constitutional defects and racial disparities in stops and frisks. For example, in the first half of 2017, stops were only slightly more likely to result in arrest for Black detainees than for White detainees, whereas in prior years there was a much greater likelihood. Moreover, unconstitutional stops and frisks have decreased substantially and are approximately the same share of all stops across all racial and ethnic categories; and
WHEREAS, Nevertheless, constitutional defects remain in Police Department stops and frisks. About one in five stops is still not supported by "reasonable suspicion" as required by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The proportion of frisks that are unconstitutional is even higher; and
WHEREAS, Racial disparities persist in stops and frisks, particularly in...
Click here for full text